<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GetToMass.com &#187; SSPX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gettomass.com/tag/sspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gettomass.com</link>
	<description>Whoever eats my flesh &#38; drinks my blood has eternal life &#38; I will raise him up on the last day ~ John 6:54</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Deep End of the Theological Pool</title>
		<link>http://www.gettomass.com/2010/02/deep-end-of-the-theological-pool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gettomass.com/2010/02/deep-end-of-the-theological-pool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 03:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John 6:54</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSPX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gettomass.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am not a member of the SSPX but I do have a brother who is.  We have gone round and round on issues concerning the Catholic church and ultimately I don&#8217;t think either one of us has budge much from our initial positions.  I think we have both left things up to prayer ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51TVDV5ZSAL._SL500_AA240_.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" />I am <strong>not </strong>a member of the SSPX but I do have a brother who is.  We have gone round and round on issues concerning the Catholic church and ultimately I don&#8217;t think either one of us has budge much from our initial positions.  I think we have both left things up to prayer and the Holy Spirit.  I believe my brother to be a poor apologist for the SSPX although that doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s not willing to have a spirited debate, his arguments just haven&#8217;t moved me nor have mine really moved him.  I&#8217;d say for more than the past year we have both dropped the &#8220;debating&#8221;, which my wife probably more accurately describes as arguing.  My best get under his skin line was telling him to &#8220;stop following excommunicated Bishops&#8221;.  Well eventually he did that since Pope Benedict XVI removed their excommunication&#8217;s.  How ever they are still not in full communion with the Pope from Rome&#8217;s standpoint.</p>
<p>Recently I saw a link in one of the comments on <a href="www.WDTPRS.com/blog" target="_blank">Fr. Z&#8217;s blog </a>for a book from the Society of St. Pius X.  The book is called &#8220;The Problem of the Liturgical Reform&#8221; which can be found here  <a href="http://www.sspx.org/books/problem%20of%20the%20liturgical%20reform.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.sspx.org/books/problem%20of%20the%20liturgical%20reform.pdf</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not through reading it yet but I would say they have a pretty decent beef with how things were handled back in the 1960s.  The book is at the theologically deep end of the pool.  But I think any reader familiar with the Catholic Mass can pick up a few things and learn a thing or two about the prayers of the Mass prior to the Vatican II Council.</p>
<p>In the end I&#8217;m pretty sure the book is not going to change where I stand, but I will have an additional lens to look at my faith with and without stressing the relationship with my brother.  I feel I am sympathetic to those who want to worship in what is now called the Extraordinary form of the Mass.  I buy the line that the core worship of the Catholic Church for more than 500 years couldn&#8217;t be a bad thing, which is how it seems some priests and bishops today view the Extraordinary form of the Mass.  I believe Pope Benedict XVI did the right thing to allow priests publicly to say that Mass without the approval of their Bishops.  I believe the greater use of the old Mass will only have positive effects on our Catholic faith. </p>
<p>But from what I&#8217;ve ready so far I believe the SSPX&#8217;s beef goes beyond the issue of the allowing the old Mass to be said freely.  Their beef is with the theology of the new Mass.  They&#8217;re not buying into the &#8220;Paschal Mystery&#8221;, as the &#8220;Paschal Mystery&#8221; is not what was used to create the old Mass.  The theology of the &#8220;Paschal Mystery&#8221; is basically in it&#8217;s infancy if you look at the history of the Catholic Church as a whole.  This is very weighty stuff but then shouldn&#8217;t we know some of this anyway?  This is our faith after all, we are talking about our eternal salvation.</p>
<p>So when things get deep or heavy, I think thats a sign we should pray.  May we pray to the Holy Spirit for unity among all Christians while remaining true to the teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gettomass.com/2010/02/deep-end-of-the-theological-pool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

